nothing to do with cake…
Monday, May 24th, 2010but it’s got everything to do with getting some force behind the Gulf oil spill clean-up.
There’s loads of difficulty in cleaning up a mess that’s 5,000 feet under water. It’s kinda crazy to have started drilling there anyway since it’s so hard to deal with the clean-up, but until it’s cleaned up, why don’t we BOYCOTT BP? That way they’ll surely get the message: it’s not OK to fumble and bumble your way to a resolution that they you haven’t yet found, and don’t seem likely to. That they had no real plan B is really clear. That’s reason enough, isn’t it?
But also consider that BP doesn’t even stand to lose much money over this. Direct clean-up costs will be high of course, but relative to their profits it’s not much pain. The $75 million damages cap is laughable. Any big oil company would very logically calculate and conclude that drilling in deep waters is worth the financial risk. And, don’t forget insurance–coverage for this type of scenario sounds more like their Plan B. Congress’s attempt to revise the liability cap to one billion plus are totally going to be challenged in the courts and, if my cob-webbed brain remembers ex-post facto rules correctly, changing the rules of the game after the damages have occurred will not be looked upon very favorably.
So, I think it’s really up to the consumers in the US to send a message that BP, and the rest of the industry, will hear very plainly: take your mess seriously, clean it up, and be quick about it. I’m surprised no one has brought it up–or at least I haven’t seen it reported. I think there is plenty of reason to be angry at what BP and their rig operators did, and it’s just made worse by the lack of planning and readiness to deal with a problem like this. A boycott will tell them people are disappointed and just don’t trust them.
Boycott BP until the spill is capped, perhaps even cleaned. And then decide if their worthy of your hard earned cash.
